Well, unlimited veto leads to the UN. Which is perhaps slightly shy of disaster. I think an unlimited veto mostly leads to disaster when a veto-holder has only negative interests, and thus can't be negotiated out of vetoing.
With a one-shot veto, I would worry about how to get around the veto by simply reoffering the law. If you can't reoffer a vetoed law, can you offer a slightly amended law? Can a candidate who's been vetoed stand again? After how long?
Is the veto-veto historical? If not, what's the rationale for including it?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
With a one-shot veto, I would worry about how to get around the veto by simply reoffering the law. If you can't reoffer a vetoed law, can you offer a slightly amended law? Can a candidate who's been vetoed stand again? After how long?
Is the veto-veto historical? If not, what's the rationale for including it?