It comes across like an editorial, not a well balanced article presenting both sides of an issue. And while you've captured all the big issues two details that bothered me include: A. the fact that they cite the high number of women earning Ph.Ds in psychology despite the fact that psychology is pretty consistently mocked for not being 'real' science, a trend that's correlated with women taking over the field and B. the fact that one of Pinker's listed credentials is being related to her brother just serves to highlight the gender discrimination.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)