orichalcum: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] orichalcum at 09:24pm on 14/09/2004
I probably shouldn't have mentioned the 6-lb burger to [livejournal.com profile] julianyap, but well, it seemed inevitable. I'm a bad girl.

While I'm being a bad girl, two more amusing quotes from J&T's wedding:

KidCthulhu, to Fajitas at the end of the evening: Go now, and take your lovely wife and korak like a war lizard!
(If you weren't at the relevant game, it's really not worth explaining.)

Sam: So, oddly enough, silk boxers turn out to be a seasonal item, only sold around Valentine's Day and the holiday season.
AHM: Oh, like cocktail weiners.


I've got a nasty sore throat now, which I'm really hoping isn't strep or worse. Ah well - yet more excuses for honey! Because some folks asked for it, my Rosh Hashanah Sauteed Apples and Honey recipe:



In a large skillet or saucepan, melt 1/8 cup of butter (2 tbs?). Add 2
sliced and cored apples; peel if you want to. Cook, stirring constantly for
6-7 minutes. Add 1/4 cup honey, and some cinnamon and nutmeg, and stir
around in the pan until the honey melts and caramelizes over the apples. Eat
while hot, possibly with some cream or ice cream if you want to be really
decadent.

Takes only about ten minutes, and oh so yummy. I'm going to use the goody bag apples from the wedding for it.




So, I was watching part of the stress that J&T have been undergoing the last month or so, and remembering my own stress and that of other couples, and wondering, "Is it worth it?" Is a wedding really worth that much agonizing and energy and time and money? But one positive way to look at wedding planning, I was thinking, is that in the process of planning a wedding, you have to go through many of the same sorts of issues and problems that you do in the course of the actual marriage. Each of you will value different parts differently, just as each of you will value different parts of everyday life differently. You will have to make compromises about time and financial management. You have to deal productively and amicably with each others' extended families and friends. You have to remember, in all of this, to love each other and to frequently express that love. Maybe wedding planning exists because it's easier to work out a compromise over what cake-topper you want than over what house you want, over what the food will be for dinner than whether or not you should both become vegetarians, because it's easier to put up with Uncle Ernie for five minutes than it is for an entire weekend at Disneyworld. At least, this is the positive spin I'm choosing to put on it at the moment. Not that I won't totally understand if various of my friends elope, as they have threatened.
Mood:: 'content' content
There are 20 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] digitalemur.livejournal.com at 03:50am on 15/09/2004
All these wonderful wedding reports are giving me warm fuzzies. Awwwwwwwh. Thanks for writing about it.

(My mother has threatened to hunt me down, if I elope.)
 
posted by [identity profile] ladybird97.livejournal.com at 01:41pm on 15/09/2004
*snicker* Korok like a war lizard. hee hee.

And I think I might make that apples-and-honey recipe tonight. It's way yummy!
 
posted by [identity profile] statisticalfool.livejournal.com at 02:34pm on 15/09/2004
This isn't directed at you, but rather is the general argument why weddings should be (but sadly, aren't) considered a class luxury.


Median income for married couple sans children: $51k pre-tax (with this being an overestimate, since this includes older childless couples who are likely to be making more). After tax, we're probably down to about $38k.

The average cost of a wedding: $18k.
Throw in an engagement ring at two months salary: $5k

On one hand, buying everything involved in a wedding may involve financial management. On the other hand, not spending two-thirds of your post-tax income for an entire year, especially when you expect to make an extremely large down payment on a house and take on large amounts of debts immediately afterwards may constitute much sounder financial management.

Or, or, or, in other terms: $23k dumped into the stock market (12% average returns - 3% inflation) at age 25 yields at 65: $830,000 in constant dollars, or more or less, your entire retirement fund.

 
posted by [identity profile] digitalemur.livejournal.com at 05:10pm on 15/09/2004
Okay, based on that rationale, I _am_ going to elope.

And get my ass in gear to get a TIAA-CREF counseling session and put more of my investments in stocks. But that's a separate issue.
 
posted by [identity profile] digitalemur.livejournal.com at 05:11pm on 15/09/2004
Oh and while I'm at it I'll be pissed about how much of the wedding costs are stupid markups. And how much of a scam the industry is. Scummy.

But then again, there's also cake.
 
posted by [identity profile] statisticalfool.livejournal.com at 05:39pm on 15/09/2004
More fuel: Average cost of a NJ/NY/CT wedding: $31k.

My cake theory: if you were to come up with the exact same design for a cake, called it one instance a wedding cake, and in another instance, call it a cake, you would pay probably half as much for the second.

So just think: elopement = 2 cakes!
 
posted by [identity profile] statisticalfool.livejournal.com at 05:46pm on 15/09/2004
By the way, I don't discount the fun of weddings. I just think that a large part of that fun can be replicated by having everybody go to a big restaurant, then rent out some common space in a hotel, have an ipod churning away all night, have a marvelous array of cakes and snacks and spend about one thousand. Heck, you could even make it a huge potluck, and get out cheaper.


 
posted by [identity profile] digitalemur.livejournal.com at 08:47pm on 15/09/2004
Yeah, and to that end, I'd need to hold such an event in Ohio for my relatives' sake. And also as an excuse to have fun out there. And that would make a lot of things cheaper. Thank goodness I'm crafty and have a herd of relatives who are game to assist with putting stuff together; that would help a lot.
 
posted by [identity profile] hca.livejournal.com at 04:29pm on 16/09/2004
AVERAGE COST OF A WEDDING = $18K???

You're KIDDING, right?

You're not. Are you.

What in hell is the matter with us as a society? I should be a able to buy a white dress, have some flowers, rent a room, eat good food and good cake and dance in celebration of my marriage, without dooming my retirement fund!

 
posted by [identity profile] orichalcum.livejournal.com at 04:32pm on 16/09/2004
I think that that average is really distorted by the small number of absolutely ridiculous weddings. Our wedding, which admittedly cut corners on a whole number of areas, but was quite enjoyable, cost sround $6500, including the rehearsal dinner. You can have a very nice wedding that still feels like a real wedding without going overboard; it's just that it's very easy to go overboard, because of the setup of the wedding industry.
 
posted by [identity profile] kenjari.livejournal.com at 04:41pm on 16/09/2004
Right on. Our wedding also cost much less than the average (about half, if I'm calculating correctly), and I think it turned out very well. I think you're right about the distortion from the number of overly extravagant weddings. And about the wedding industry. Despite what they would have you believe, your wedding will not suck if you omit the alcohol, pare down your guest list, and forego pricey appetizers. None of your guests will remember whether or not the chairbacks were festooned with tulle swags. I was lucky, I think, in that the event coordinator at the inn where I had my wedding was very up front and honest about what services would cost extra and what we could do without.
 
posted by [identity profile] kenjari.livejournal.com at 04:42pm on 16/09/2004
Oh yeah, you can actually save money by having your dress custom made from fabric you buy yourself.
 
posted by [identity profile] orichalcum.livejournal.com at 05:09pm on 16/09/2004
Exactly. I've heard many great things about your wedding, and _not one_ person ever said, "Well, I guess it was okay, but I really missed those tulle swags." Yes, the wedding industry is full of hoopla, and if you follow their advcie assiduously, you will spend much money that you might be able to use well elsewhere. But the real thing is that it's not like, I suspect, either Kenjari or I had the thought process, "Well, we have this money. We could spend it on new furniture or student loans, or we could get married." You're making a erroneous calculation, statistical fool. The money used for a marriage is not necessarily coming from the same sources/calculations as regular financial considerations.
 
posted by [identity profile] statisticalfool.livejournal.com at 05:18pm on 16/09/2004
Same sources? I'm not sure what you mean. If we're talking external (read: parental) funding, than I'd guess that most parents would be just as happy to reroute wedding funding to downpayment funding.

There's also the issue of how much is recouped by registries, and whether having a "not-wedding" lowers that substantially.
 
posted by [identity profile] statisticalfool.livejournal.com at 05:12pm on 16/09/2004
This is fair, that there are a lot of ways to keep the costs down by just saying: "Do I really need to pay several thousand dollars for photographs when my friends have digital cameras?"

Yet, and again, this is only observation, but a lot of the other ways you can cut the cost of weddings are by throwing more time, which is increasingly difficult for two-worker couples. (This is of course, not to imply that grad school isn't very much 'work', but rather that it's probably much easier to deal with preparations when you can just take an hour or two or a day off at mostly will to work on the wedding).

How much of the savings are possible without increasing time demands and how many aren't? Not sure.

This probably also lines up to: "Social expectations pressure 'complete weddings' pressure financial disaster." where the people most likely to buy into the social expectations are the ones least likely to realize the impending financial disaster, and contrapositively, the people least likely for financial disaster are also the ones who aren't going to be swayed by social expectations.

I can't seem to find any median data on wedding cost, which is sad. Here's another set of figures: (http://pressroom.americangreetings.com/Summer04/WeddingFacts04.html) which doesn't solve potential problems of distortion, but gives an average income ($60k pre-tax, or about $45k post-tax) versus average wedding + honeymoon ($25k + $5k = $30k). The distortion could still be there, if the amount spent on weddings grows faster than the amount that income grows, but it probably accounts for that a little.

 
posted by [identity profile] kenjari.livejournal.com at 06:17pm on 16/09/2004
The trade-off between saving money and spending time also depends quite a bit on how elaborate you decide to make the wedding. If you decide to make your own centerpieces to save money, but choose a very labor-intensive design and have a huge guest list that requires 50 tables at the reception, you're going to need plenty of free time. It also depends a lot on how much help you get from your wedding party and parents in terms of getting stuff done. My helpful Mom and one of her friends took care of all the favors and decorations (shopping and construction). My terrific bridesmaids helped with the invitations and did the seating for the reception. Giving me more time to finish my master's thesis.
 
The bad news: 18k was the lowest average estimate I could find (it seems like $22k might be the most recent figure), and is an average of costs across the entire country. I hope you decide to get married in a big rectangular state.


The good news: uh, um...society continues to emphasize both old-style gender roles and the idea that spending lots of money and gathering large amounts of debt are the only way to happiness.

Oh, wait.

the better news: don't forget to cost of the honeymoon!

Oh, wait.

I wonder how many couples who stress about financial situations, and maybe even break over those problems, might have not run into those problems with all that extra money sitting around. It's got to be at least a few.



 
posted by (anonymous) at 03:56am on 19/09/2004
I think you're ignoring the effects of a wedding versus an elopement. If you see a wedding simply as a big party that happens to be thrown at the time two people get married, then spending money to make it elaborate might seem unnecessary. But that's not all it's about. A wedding is (ideally) a once-in-a-lifetime event, which should incorporate a significant portion of the couple's friends and family, and should be something that people will remember and revisit in their memories and conversation for the rest of their lives. Yes, it's easy to spend more money than necessary on a wedding, and the wedding industry encourages just that. But there is a difference between a wedding and an elopement: the wedding is an event that is supposed to help the couple stay married by having them celebrate with their community, thus reminding (or showing) themselves that they _have_ a shared community, and also reminding that community that they care about this couple and should support them. An elopement is an opportunity for the couple to get married.

Some people do fine without this kind of community event, but I believe that, despite the need to spend some significant amount of money on it and despite the fact that it generally causes stress, it is beneficial to most couples in the long term.

-MJNH
 
So, when I suggest that the right path for most couples is to throw a cheap elopement party, by no means do I suggest (or that I would) just go to a restaurant, throw on some music, and call that a night: I'd want it to be an active celebration of the union and commitment that comes with binding ones lives together, along with remembering and renewing the bonds of family, and friendship, to support this newly formed bond, and you know, have a lot of fun with people you love as well.

What has happened in our society is that the celebration of those bonds, has somehow become inextricably linked with multi-tier cakes, very expensive dresses, with bridesmaids in matching dresses, flowers, and rings which cost two months salary. Some advice here is that you get out of this with a lot less financial damage than most people do (although I'd still argue that while it's clearly less important, ($6500-$1000) = $5500 can be a car or a $172K retirement fund chunk of change), and that's nice, but I don't see why you should buy into the industry at all.

I'd be surprised if any conversations even vaguely resemble:
A: "I'm celebrating my lifelong commitment to B, will you come?"
B: "Will there be multi-tier cake/people in very large dresses?"
A: "No."
B:

Let's note the word I've avoided, which is tradition: it obviously factors into my analysis that tradition has never been something I've had a huge amount of reverence for: that many people have had two-month salary engagement rings does not weigh on my mind. Your mileage may vary; also, I carry the short-term benefit/possible eternal drawback of not being religious, which means that I don't need to worry about religious tradition at all, although even in those circumstances, I'm not sure how much of that tradition has been dissolved into consumerism (see also: Christmas).

I just think it's easy to draw a false distinction between meaningful wedding and piece-of-paper and a gavel elopement.

ps: You also mention the once in a lifetime thing: there's the side of this which is that if you're a kind of person who thrives off accumulating peak experiences, than the tension/release of a wedding is likely to be far greater than that of a potluck/party. I'd contend that skydiving is a better choice.
 
posted by [identity profile] banana-pants.livejournal.com at 04:34pm on 19/09/2004
... will you plan our non-wedding?

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1 2
 
3 4
 
5
 
6 7 8 9 10 11
 
12 13 14
 
15
 
16 17 18
 
19 20 21 22 23
 
24 25
 
26 27
 
28
 
29
 
30