(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] gee-tar.livejournal.com at 09:52pm on 11/03/2009
Hey, I think the Elizabeths have done pretty well for themselves. Granted, not many data points to go on, but the average is high.

And what novel are you reviewing? Because a Pulitzer winning novel with those allusions seems right up my alley.
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] orichalcum.livejournal.com at 09:57pm on 11/03/2009
The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, by Junot Diaz.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] outlawradio.livejournal.com at 10:15pm on 14/03/2009
I LOVE that book. And I think it outgeeks a lot of people.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] orichalcum.livejournal.com at 09:59pm on 11/03/2009
I think EII might bring it down, but yeah, high average overall, certainly. I decided not to focus for the goods on monarchs with 2 or less data points, though.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] apintrix.livejournal.com at 10:12pm on 11/03/2009
Yeah. I vote Elizabeth for best English monarch name EVAH.
:D
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] orichalcum.livejournal.com at 10:23pm on 11/03/2009
I call bias. :)
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] apintrix.livejournal.com at 10:46pm on 11/03/2009
I have no idea what could possibly lead you to that conclusion.
[link] [parent] [reply]

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
1
 2
 
 3
3
 4
 
5
 
 6
1
 7
2
 8
3
 9
1
 10
2
 11
 
12
1
 13
2
 14
 
 15
 
 16
2
 17
3
 18
 
19
1
 20
2
 21
1
 22
1
 23
 
 24
1
 25
 
26
1
 27
 
 28
 
 29
 
 30
1