posted by
orichalcum at 01:54pm on 20/04/2005
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Imagine that you're an undergrad, not necessarily a classics major, but someone who is interested in taking a wide variety of courses. (Please feel free to forward this post to actual undergrads.)
Which of these course descriptions sounds interesting and exciting to you, particularly if you had to choose between one of the two Roman literature ones, and which doesn't, and why?
This course explores the foundation of modern assumptions about gender roles and sexuality through a study of the cultures of ancient Greece, Rome, and the Near East. Through looking at a variety of different types of text and media, including epics, tragedy, philosophy, history, art, papyri, and graffiti, we will trace the evolution of ancient social values and their relationship to modern ideals. We will focus on the ways in which ancient women negotiated thier lives in highly patriarchal societies. Texts will include Hippocratic medical writings, the poems of Sappho and Sulpicia, Plato's Symposium, Aeschylus' Oresteia, and Ovid's erotic poetry, as well as modern criticism.
This course focuses on the literary reaction to the autocracy and prescriptive value structures enforced by the early Emperors of the Roman Empire, especially Augustus. We will begin by briefly examining the officially approved texts of Vergil and Horace and the ways in which such texts undermine their explicit messages of praise and submission, before turning to actual subversive texts such as Ovid's Ars Amatoria, the poem he was exiled to the Black Sea for writing, Seneca's "Pumpkinification of the Emperor Claudius," Petronius' Satyricon, Tacitus' Agricola, and the humorous critiques of Juvenal and Martial, as well as some early Christian works. We will discuss together how censorship functioned in the ancient Roman world, how literature became an outlet for the stifled political ambitions of Roman Senators, and in what ways this social criticism shaped or reinforced the structures of Roman society.
In the years from 80 - 40 BC, the city of Rome was blessed or cursed not only with a spectacular array of talented leaders and generals, such as Julius Caesar and Pompey the Great, but also with many brilliant authors and poets who chronicled the chaos and confusion of civil war and the breakdown of an enduring political system. This course focuses on the works of authors like Cicero, Caesar himself, Sallust, and Catullus, both in their more formal speeches and chronicles and in a close study of Cicero's exhaustive and illuminating correspondence with the great men and women of his day. Through the lens of literature, we will come to understand the interrelationships and social and political developments which marked this period and the causes of its final evolution.
Since the beginning of the cinematic industry in the early 20th century, films glorifying ancient Roman spectacle or retelling Greek myths have been a popular and enduring genre of cinema. In the past few years, we have seen a major resurgence in films and television series about the ancient world with works like Gladiator and Troy. This course seeks to explore the reasons behind the popularity of this setting and the changing ways in which ancient Rome and Greece were represented and used as metaphors for contemporary issues over the last hundred years. We will combine a close examination of a variety of major modern works, including Spartacus, Ben Hur, I Claudius, Monty Python's The Life of Brian, and A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, with the ancient texts that inspired or influenced them, such as Tacitus, Livy, Plautus, and the Gospels. We will also study modern criticism of these films and the ways in which they inspired scenes in later science fiction and fantasy movies.
Which of these course descriptions sounds interesting and exciting to you, particularly if you had to choose between one of the two Roman literature ones, and which doesn't, and why?
This course explores the foundation of modern assumptions about gender roles and sexuality through a study of the cultures of ancient Greece, Rome, and the Near East. Through looking at a variety of different types of text and media, including epics, tragedy, philosophy, history, art, papyri, and graffiti, we will trace the evolution of ancient social values and their relationship to modern ideals. We will focus on the ways in which ancient women negotiated thier lives in highly patriarchal societies. Texts will include Hippocratic medical writings, the poems of Sappho and Sulpicia, Plato's Symposium, Aeschylus' Oresteia, and Ovid's erotic poetry, as well as modern criticism.
This course focuses on the literary reaction to the autocracy and prescriptive value structures enforced by the early Emperors of the Roman Empire, especially Augustus. We will begin by briefly examining the officially approved texts of Vergil and Horace and the ways in which such texts undermine their explicit messages of praise and submission, before turning to actual subversive texts such as Ovid's Ars Amatoria, the poem he was exiled to the Black Sea for writing, Seneca's "Pumpkinification of the Emperor Claudius," Petronius' Satyricon, Tacitus' Agricola, and the humorous critiques of Juvenal and Martial, as well as some early Christian works. We will discuss together how censorship functioned in the ancient Roman world, how literature became an outlet for the stifled political ambitions of Roman Senators, and in what ways this social criticism shaped or reinforced the structures of Roman society.
In the years from 80 - 40 BC, the city of Rome was blessed or cursed not only with a spectacular array of talented leaders and generals, such as Julius Caesar and Pompey the Great, but also with many brilliant authors and poets who chronicled the chaos and confusion of civil war and the breakdown of an enduring political system. This course focuses on the works of authors like Cicero, Caesar himself, Sallust, and Catullus, both in their more formal speeches and chronicles and in a close study of Cicero's exhaustive and illuminating correspondence with the great men and women of his day. Through the lens of literature, we will come to understand the interrelationships and social and political developments which marked this period and the causes of its final evolution.
Since the beginning of the cinematic industry in the early 20th century, films glorifying ancient Roman spectacle or retelling Greek myths have been a popular and enduring genre of cinema. In the past few years, we have seen a major resurgence in films and television series about the ancient world with works like Gladiator and Troy. This course seeks to explore the reasons behind the popularity of this setting and the changing ways in which ancient Rome and Greece were represented and used as metaphors for contemporary issues over the last hundred years. We will combine a close examination of a variety of major modern works, including Spartacus, Ben Hur, I Claudius, Monty Python's The Life of Brian, and A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, with the ancient texts that inspired or influenced them, such as Tacitus, Livy, Plautus, and the Gospels. We will also study modern criticism of these films and the ways in which they inspired scenes in later science fiction and fantasy movies.
(no subject)
So #1 is sure to be popular with the feminist and gay crowd, and those that think you might get into what kinky things they did back then.
#2 lost me at "literary reaction to the autocracy and prescriptive value structures". A student scanning a blue book isn't going to try to parse that sentence. However it sounds like the most interesting course if you figure out the wording.
#3 is easy to understand, but sounds like a rather general course of Great Roman Writings. If I was trying to pick between them #2 sounds like a better course, but if I was skimming looking for an elective based on descriptions #3 would catch my eye first.
#4 is also going to be popular. "We get to watch Gladiator and Monty Python for credit? Awesome!" You can bet this would be the elective I'd pick.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Speaking of which, the last course also looks cool. Watching movies for credit? Yay! But this is the slacker undergrad in me talking.
Don't know if this helps, but that's my opinion.
(no subject)
Working just from the titles, #1 goes directly to the "please ignore me" centers of my brain (too high a buzzword bingo score), as does #4 (though for different reasons), while #2 and #3 would almost certainly have gotten me to read the descriptions and course-meeting times, back when I read such things.
Assuming I had actually read all the descriptions, I would probably consider shopping #2, #1 and #3, in that order, since politics and snark both have great personal appeal to me, and #3 sounds (as
jendavis77 says) more like a general survey Lit course, which I wouldn't necessarily have gone for. But when I was shopping #1 I would take a careful look at who else was taking it and see how much latent hostility toward the male of the species I was going to have to field during the semester.
All of this assumes that I don't know the professor, of course—both #1 and #4 raise alerts for me partially because in the wrong hands they could attract a crowd of students I just didn't feel like dealing with.
(no subject)
Hmm, I agree with most of what's been said:
#1 Ack, feminist theory alert! I dislike feminist theory as such; I think you'll get a crowd that does like off it and turn off the majority that doesn't. This is perhaps unfair, because I bet this class *taught by you* would be really interesting. Maybe try to rewrite it so as not to use the phrase "gender and sexuality" (this will likely make you go "argh", but there you are; it's not your fault perfectly good descriptive phrases have been co-opted by annoying people)?
#2 I like this! Bet you'd get the Democrat polisci crowd shopping for lit/history electives. Smart and interesting. Although Jen may be right about some of the phrasing--I can hack it, but your average public school freshman, maybe not. I'd say, keep the phrase (to show you're serious), but put it at the end where it doesn't make people stop reading before they know what the course is about.
#3 What Jen said. Feels like a first-year survey course, which I'm guessing is what it *is*--and that's fine for an intro course, you know?
#4 Does undeniably have that "too fun to be serious" flavor. Appealing; I'd be genuinely drawn to it as an elective that would be easy to engage with and a class I'd probably enjoy. Might worry that it was too much of a cream-puff if I were considering majoring.
As written, 2, 4, 1, 3 (but three would be higher if I were looking for basic intro classics courses.)
Reaction
#1: So, in fact, they originally wanted me to call it "Women in Antiquity," and I have argued against that, because I think courses are much more interesting when they're dealing with the gender identifications of both men and women and that sexuality is inextricably intertwined with that. I mean, I could call it "Wives, Whores, and Man-On-Boy Love" or something sexy like that, but frankly I do sort of want students who will engage with the matter seriously, and the course _has_ a bunch of feminist theory involved (and queer theory.) Also, this is one of the major courses that they'll be evaluating me on at Northwestern when I apply for the permanent job, and I'd rather not seem like a total cream puff prof.
#2: Have changed first sentence to "This course focuses on the literary reaction to authoritarian rule and the emphasis on officially mandated "family values" in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE, particularly during the Augustan Age.
I hope this is better.
#3: Yeah, it's totally a survey course, but that's cuz that's something the dept really doesn't have. I just want it to sound like an interesting course, which I may need to work more on.
#4: Movies are a serious academic discipline, people! :) But seriously, one of the points of a course like that is to lure people into classics. That's why I also emphasize the original texts. OTOH, because I don't want to frighten my colleagues, I'm not mentioning that we'll also be watching at least clips from Xena: Warrior Princess. :)
Re: Reaction
That reminds me of one of my favorite college professors. Bill Nericcio taught "Modern American Fiction," an upper division general ed requirement I was sure would be horribly dry. The first day of class, he announced that he was hereby renaming the course "The Seductive Hallucination," since they wouldn't let him print it in the catalog.
That won over most of the class immediately.
For the record, I'd say that the first and the last would pique my interest over the others.
(no subject)
#2 - Very interesting! I agree that the wording of the first line should be changed, but the course itself sounds fascinating, and really creative. (And you mentioned the Pumpkinification. Hee :)
#3 - Even if it does cover a lot of the Big Names, I like the way you view them from a specifically political angle. And again, the description really emphasizes the interdisciplinary nature of the course, which is always a good thing in my book.
#4 - This one is going to be a lot of fun! I do agree that a lot of students will be coming to it looking for a gut, but that's going to be true of any course that involves pop culture.
If I had to choose between 2 and 3, I think I'd choose 2, because it sounds like it gets more deeply into the social and cultural aspects of Roman life, while 3 sounds more strictly political. But they all sound wonderful! Good luck!
(no subject)
#1:I missed a class that studied Roman dress and interaction in a similar fashion. It seemed like it would be an awesome course, and any course in which a variety of mediums are presented automatically gets +2 on my list of courses I want to take. Gender and sexuality, while buzzwords here at Wesleyan, are strong themes and a class which explores those themes in a Classical context would be interesting to take part in.
#2 Ah, literature in the Roman world, something I wish I had more time to study in depth, and with a course like this, it seems like I could in some detail. The Ars Amatoria is a wonderful read, and a class which could make it function well, specifically within that context would be very interesting.
#3 I saw Cicero and almost screamed. All of the other authors are mostly wonderful reads, and I know not everyone is as turned off by Cicero as I am. Thematically, #2 sounds like a far more comprehensive course, that would draw in a wider range of ideas, while this class would feel like a lecture course with less room for discussion.
#4 The trouble with film related classes is that you are going to draw a lot of film people, and with a Classics topic, a lot of classics and classical studies people. I have classes currently with that overlap, and sometimes it feels as though I am getting more out of a situation with so many crossovers, and sometimes, I feel like the class is much too large and I get ignored on things that I would like to explore further. It's an intriguing idea and sure to draw the widest audience.
Hope that helped.
(no subject)
Speaking of feminist theory, totally check out Toril Moi! She rocks my world! Ok, she's also my stepmother, but she's an incredibly brilliant AND clear feminist writer, and has chapters/articles called things like "What is a woman?" that might be relevant to your course. Just sayin'.
By the way, what this made me think more than anything was, wow, I've never been particularly interested in Roman stuff, but now I want to take one of your courses!
Thanks!
Re: Thanks!
She's fantastic, btw, so definitely check her out.
Yes about Chicago :)
(no subject)
With the lit classes, I would almost certainly pick 2 over 3, but that's mostly because I'm just not that enthralled by classical politics/militaria (I know, heresy -- sorry!). I agree that your redo on the first sentence is an improvement.
(no subject)
My second choice, had I to choose, would be the film course. It looks like it would be tremendously fun, and a great way of looking at changing norms and expectations as reflected through the director's lens.