orichalcum: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] orichalcum at 10:20am on 29/06/2005
Or as one of my old professors used to call him, Dionysus the Little.

Why, may you ask, do I cherish this anger against a 6th century CE Catholic monk?

Because I'm currently trying to describe the time period in which the Roman poet Ovid wrote. That is to say, the era of someone who lived from 43 B.C.(E.) to 18 C.E. (A.D.)

So, he's a "1st century BCE- 1st century CE poet." This sounds horrible, and I run into this problem all the time, because Dionysus stuck his _inaccurate_ median point in the middle of the Augustan Age, one of the most important historical and literary periods in the ancient world.

The little guy couldn't have dated things from Jesus' crucifixion? Or at least gotten the darn date right, which would have helped a bit?

I won't even go into all the reasons why the date is totally wrong.
Music:: Brains/Money
Mood:: 'infuriated' infuriated
There are 4 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] foldedfish.livejournal.com at 05:19pm on 29/06/2005
The problem clearly lies not with Dionysus but with God the Father, who inconsiderately arranged for the birth and death of His only son during a period most inconvenient for your paper.
 
posted by [identity profile] orichalcum.livejournal.com at 05:48pm on 29/06/2005
I can argue lots of good theological and historical reasons for God the Father to choose that particular moment, actually. But 1 BCE isn't a turning point for anything, even arguing that the rise of Christianity forms a major turning point in world history.
 
posted by [identity profile] foldedfish.livejournal.com at 07:36pm on 29/06/2005
Well, sure, of course He chose that moment. I mean, it was 1 BCE! He would have looked pretty dumb showing up to the Christian Era and forgetting to bring a Christ! And everyone would have called Him a procrastinator if he waited until, oh, 1945. Plus the British were a lot less likely to crucify people than the Romans, and an empty shell case makes for a lousy symbol for your religion.
 
posted by [identity profile] orichalcum.livejournal.com at 08:51pm on 29/06/2005
I have this wonderful image now of the Fourth Wise Man.

WM#1: I bring gold!
WM#2: I bring frankincense!
WM#3: I bring myrrh!
NSWM#4: Um, sorry, didn't realize it was a potluck.
Mary : (hissing to the Holy Spirit) I told You we should have sent out registry cards!

What I meant, of course, is that if I were an omniscient God, picking a rare moment when much of the world was comparatively stable and at peace and reasonable life expectancies, and my current most moral monotheistic religion was open to new ideas, would seem like a Good Plan. I mean, hey, you don't hear Joseph saying, "Well, we would have shown up for the census, but we couldn't because what if the Parthians invaded during that week and stole all my wood?"

It's a good thing I don't believe in Hell. :)

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1 2
 
3 4
 
5
 
6 7 8 9 10 11
 
12 13 14
 
15
 
16 17 18
 
19 20 21 22 23
 
24 25
 
26 27
 
28
 
29
 
30