orichalcum: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] orichalcum at 01:47pm on 22/10/2004
As some of you may know, BC'04's big new ad, which will be widely shown, is called "Wolves" and features wolves running through a snowy forest as a metaphor for the terrorists who will sneak in and hunt us down if we elect John Kerry.

As a wolf fan, I'd really like to object. North American wolves are virtually harmless to humans - yes, they can kill livestock, but we've really got the superior advantage here in firepower, folks. There aren't nearly enough of them. Furthermore, wolves take care of true menaces like coyotes. European wolves, who were dangerous to humans, were  hunted almost to extinction several hundred years ago. Wolves are beautiful, intelligent, resourceful amoral pack animals. If you want to run an ad about preying on the vulnerable, try "Vultures."
There are 3 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] redhound.livejournal.com at 06:28pm on 22/10/2004
Slander! Vultures are also intelligent and resourceful, and never try to eat things that aren't already dead, contrary to popular belief. (Which I guess qualifies as "vulnerable", but seems sort of moot).

You got them on the beautiful point, though.

 
posted by (anonymous) at 12:43am on 23/10/2004
I have nothing substantive to add, but my dad's a wolf fan (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/069100613X/qid=1098491876/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-6901961-2992653?v=glance&s=books) too.

You are completely right in that wolves' reputation as predators is far overblown compared to the threat they actually pose.

--SpyScribe
 
posted by [identity profile] signsoflife.livejournal.com at 04:53pm on 25/10/2004
Have you seen Wolfpacks for Truth?

April

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1 2
 
3 4
 
5
 
6 7 8 9 10 11
 
12 13 14
 
15
 
16 17 18
 
19 20 21 22 23
 
24 25
 
26 27
 
28
 
29
 
30